home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: susx.ac.uk!kcci1
- From: kcci1@central.susx.ac.uk (Alan L.M. Buxey)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,demon.tech.amiga
- Subject: Re: Is MUI processor intensive?
- Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,demon.tech.amiga
- Date: 5 Feb 1996 09:46:11 GMT
- Organization: Institute Of Studies For Advanced Amiga Usage
- Message-ID: <4f4jl3$j7m@infa.central.susx.ac.uk>
- References: <9602031422.AA003u7@hectortd.demon.co.uk> <1101.6607T997T2223@crl.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: solx1.central.susx.ac.uk
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Joseph Waldvogel posted the following:
-
- : Ok, 28Mzh against 14 Mzh, that's not no 4x Faster, that's only 2x faster, Not
- : noticalble. Then you have to consider the 16-bit A600 to the 32-bit A1200
-
- i think with Amigas of low horsepower (as A1200 is with just fastRAM) an
- increase in speed by a factor of 2 is _very_ noticeable.
-
- ANT time that there is 2x speed increase, it is noticeable...if i got an
- 040 for my A1200 instead of my 50MHz 030, there would be a 2x speed
- increase - and i _for one_ would REALLY notice it! :)
-
- : least with the A1200 I can always go 060 and probley PowerPC, besides the fact
- : of AGA over that ESC system.
-
- so? now that they have made the 1st ever accel. for A600, whats stopping
- them making a PPC card for the A600 now? ;)
-
- alan
-
- --
- -T H E A L A N T I M E S- FREE Distribution: >1,000,000 copies worldwide!
- Date: Mon Feb 5 08:47:29 GMT 1996 Issue:01/00/00 NOT to be carried on M.S.N.!
- ** Confidential! ** {begin 644 address.txt} Work it out...
- {D:'1T<#HO+W=W=RYS=7-S97@N86,N=6LO57-E<G,O:V-C:3$*}{ end}Replies Appreciated :)
-